The Eurosystem might have a fatal flaw. But it’s not this


Willem Buiter has just published his book, Central Banks as Fiscal Players, online. @jvtklooster alerted us to this, along with one of its most controversial arguments. The controversy in question is that the Eurosystem, that is the European Central Bank and the central banks of the 19 member states, has a fatal flaw: the national central banks can go bankrupt. Here’s an excerpt: The 19 national central banks (NCBs) hold significant amounts of assets for their own risk rather than on a risk-sharing basis and for some of these NCBs a significant share of these assets is subject to material credit risk. Because NCBs have no control over their issuance of central bank money – this is a collective decision taken by the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) – a central bank can go bankrupt – become insolvent. Effectively, all euro-denominated assets and liabilities of an NCB (and all euro-denominated Eurozone sovereign debt instruments) are foreign-currency-denominated financial instruments, both from the perspective of the issuers (including sovereigns) and from the perspective of the holders, including the NCBs. But is he right? In a sense, he is. Besides in exceptional circumstances (more on which later), the terms on which the Eurosystem lends central bank money is decided back in Frankfurt by the governing council. Every national central bank governor sits on the council, but the real power lies with the six insiders that also sit on the ECB’s executive board. It is they who design the policy responses — and, unlike other members, in each and every meeting hold the right vote on them. It is not just the cost of borrowing that the council determines, but also the collateral that can be accepted in exchange for central bank loans. The exceptional circumstance here is so-called Emergency Liquidity Assistance, or ELA. ELA can be granted at the discretion (and risk) of the national central bank to lenders that have collateral so poor that would be deemed unacceptable for the purposes of the ECB’s regular auctions. However, even the amount of ELA offered can be vetoed by a two-thirds majority of the governing council. All of which means, while Buiter might be overstating the case to say national central banks “have no control” over the issuance of central bank money, they have far less authority than other monetary authorities.It is indeed a flaw in the system. It is also one that has influenced the way the eurozone’s central bankers design their policies. It has meant, for instance, that the €2.6tn (and counting) quantitative easing programme is set up in a way that says more about the Eurosystem’s political economy than it does the architecture of the eurozone’s financial markets. Government bond purchases are not made on the basis of the outstanding amounts of debt in each member state’s market; Instead they are divvied up based on the amount of capital each member state contributes to the ECB. Those capital shares largely reflect the size of a member state’s economy and its population, meaning that more German bonds are bought than Italian ones despite the sovereign debt market being relatively smaller in the eurozone’s largest and most populous state. As Buiter points out, risks are often not shared, with national central banks responsible for the bulk of any losses incurred on their holdings of their own government’s debt.But, if a central bank incurs losses and falls into the red, does this matter? As @jvtklooster points out, a central bank is not a regular business.
Still, opinions differ and former ECB president Jean-Claude Trichet was one insider who shared Buiter’s view that negative capital was a dangerous thing. Indeed the ECB under his stewardship was forever admonishing the Czech National Bank for the losses on its balance sheet. Trichet’s view was that negative capital puts pressure on a central bank’s independence to set monetary policy as they see fit, void of political pressure. The reason being that in times when central banks are in the black, they usually hand their profits over to the government. And when lawmakers notice the funds are missing, they try to interfere with central banks’ policy deliberations in a bid to recoup the funds.  We think this is far fetched. Losses are not ideal for anyone, including the central bank. But you need to look at the circumstances in which they develop and ask what is the alternative? Central banks such as the Czechs’ and Israel’s that find themselves in the position of being in the red are usually there because of costs incurred on the interventions they make in foreign exchange markets to counter volatile movements in their currencies. Note that this is about managing the pace of appreciations and depreciations and is, therefore, different from a currency peg. The Czech response to the ECB, which we entirely agree with, was to argue that the central bank’s credibility owed more to its ability to guard against wild fluctuations in the value of its currency than the health of its balance sheet.We would add that negative capital positions often prove short-lived. While the Eurosystem central banks are limited in what they can do to control the supply and cost of central bank money, they do get a share of the profits that come from seigniorage — that is, the business of printing banknotes.As Buiter has written, this industry is “wildly profitable” and he himself expects the Eurosystem to reap gains of between €2tn and €6.9tn. Gains that will be divided between the national central banks according to the capital key. You cannot dismiss a lack of control the national central banks have; in many respects Buiter is right to label them “glorified currency boards”. It is one among many dysfunctional elements of the eurozone. Over time one of those elements might well prove fatal, but we doubt it will be the bankruptcy of a national central bank that pulls the whole system down. 

Venture capital for the ‘forgotten’
The troublesome Trump inside trading claim
The US economy is not recession-proof
Hedge fund bro gonna hedge fund bro
What do women want? Some crypto flavoured mansplaining, apparently.
The Fed’s wishful thinking on inflation
Dalio and Diddy: when genius collides
State-backed crypto is a contradiction
Rejoice! Venture capital wants to pay for your holiday
Are electric vehicles more damaging than diesel? 
The £3bn hole in the Tory manifesto
ArtGo loses its marbles
Are banks really magic money trees?
Will Lagarde’s sneaky tweet change much? 
Can we all calm down about Apple Card’s “gender bias”
UBS’ billionaire boondoggle 
When fast fashion jumps on the eco-wagon
GenX will set central banks’ climate response
The stablecoin anathema 
Masters of the universe, don’t be scared of Elizabeth Warren
Missing: the GE short report
The average lifespan of a fiat currency isn’t 27 years
Lord King: Brexit is no big deal
No inflation? Tell that to my landlord  
Today, in fintech marketing
YouGov’s “blockchain-based” sell-your-own data platform makes no sense (*update) 
Presented without comment headed
Ride-sharing apps can’t save the planet (obv)
The WeWork bull case
No deal Brexit is not a hedge fund conspiracy
Europe’s digital infrastructure issue
Let’s give a helping hand to Andrew Yang
Anatomy of a malware scam
ARK Invest’s Tesla model gathers dust
A delirious defence of Uber
WeLiquid: Adam Neumann pockets $700m
Yesterday, in efficient markets
The warm fuzzy feeling of indirectly owning Tencent
The best of Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas
Apple/Tesla: M&A and heartbreak
Did Beyonce make $300m from Uber’s IPO?
Bitcoin is the 10-year Treasury of our time
High resolution music is a solution looking for a problem
Amazon is furious about this negative review
Missing: $500bn of American savings
Blockchain for Brexit: a wonderfully terrible idea
The Bank of Hodlers [sic] (sigh)
Behind the curtain at China Ding Yi Feng
An answer to Mark Cuban’s question
Crumbs! It’s CRYPTO: the movie!
National Beverage Corp loses its fizz, and its mind
Amazon won’t spin-off Amazon Web Services
Mensch! Dan McCrum is innocent, ok?
Europe’s $1 trillion tax gap
Why online propaganda mobs are an investment red flag
Davos has produced an amazing new guide on precisely how not to think about risk
When the public relations industry does PR for itself
Who wants to be crippled by student debt?
The bitcoin price is wrong
The warm fuzzy feeling of Goldman debt
“Cryptoassets” are crashing again. Is it time to start calling them cryptoliabilities instead?
Puff the tragic cryptowagon smokes out the Mumsnet demographic
Don’t write off the public sector
Initiative Q: an elementary pyramid scheme with grandiose ideas [Update]
Moral investments aren’t outperforming
No one is killing it in crypto (not even Woz)
Too smooth: the red flag at Patisserie Valerie which was missed
No, the housing crisis will not be solved by building more homes
Sorry Civil, ‘crypto-economics’ and ‘constitutions’ won’t save journalism
‘Short-termism’ isn’t a thing, say Fed economists
Coinbase wants to be “too big to fail”, lol
Regulation and innovation don’t have to be enemies
Retailers get so lonely around the holidays
Folli Follie: $1bn of fake sales, and what to learn from the debacle
The new green evangelism
Tilray, how low can it go?
The ICO behind the tragic Everest stunt is now “airdropping” tokens from rockets
Beware the Hindenburg Omen?
The broken conversation about financial regulation
The improbably profitable, loss-making Blue Prism
The EM rout is not made in America
Wages and growth and honestly we just give up
Britain’s first blockchain-enabled co-working space isn’t blockchain-enabled
There is a FIRE that never goes out
The WeWork Garden of Eden
IQE: lumpy ‘Apple’ sauce at the pricey Cardiff chip shop
There’s only so much a central bank can do alone
Eight questions every first-time buyer should ask
MiFID II: not all doom and gloom
Tesla: getting to Q3 profitability
Turkey contagion fears are overblown [Update]
The chance of an inflation shock may be higher than you think
Sorry Tim, the humanity is not being drained out of music
Digital crop circles
What could go wrong here?
Sirius Minerals: money for a hole in the ground
The Bank of England has a strange idea of what QE achieved
One for the ladies…
‘Of course, many ridiculous papers appeared’
Is a change goin’ to come?
The capacity’s not there yet (and probably never will be)
Musk and Tesla are not inseparable
Libraries, from Carnegie to Bezos
Crypto & government: from anarchy to amity in the USA
‘I’m sorry Dave, I’m afraid I cannot sanction this Series B round’
RBC, through the FANG barrier
Self-help to buy
CFA: Chartered crypto analysts — updated
The Netflix dilemma — updated
Fujitsu’s new blockchain offering: really cheap or really expensive?
Nothing But the Shirt on Your Back
Universities of Britain: cosying up to crypto is a bad look
How to make a living in the cult of meritocracy
Spotify: Drake-oil salesmen
Oh, the digital humanity
Sports are not markets, predictions ain’t investment
Spot the difference, Steinhoff edition
Larry Robbins, a cautionary tale
The node to serfdom
Carney is down with the crypto kids
Samsonite: inventory, excess baggage, and unresolved questions
It might be a long wait for “the equivalent alternative to ICOs”
Don’t blame it on the sunshine
In corporate America, brands develop you
One in ten dollars of US housing were anonymous
Should AT&T worry more about its debt?
Who cares if Elon is incinerating capital?
Let’s not try make ‘crypto chicks’ a thing
Tokens all the way down
Eight-dimensional chess with Elon Musk
A lopsided trade is a good trade, Italian inflation edition
How to buy Italian fire insurance
Atlas bugged
Inflating inflation
Crypto’s most devout believers are suffering a crisis of faith
Plus500: past performance is no guide to the future
Noble rot in a shrinking Harbour
In defence of ticket touts
Please don’t tell individual investors to buy leveraged loans
RIB Software: the unicorn rainy-day fund
Retail is not dead
Did Soros really give Tesla a “vote of confidence”?
At a crypto conference in New York, it feels like 2017 all over again
Egregious expectations – Intelsat edition
Bitcoin cash is expanding into the void
Stop getting The Flintstones wrong
Bond investors do not care if Argentina is solvent in 100 years
Ubiquiti Networks: of cash and borrowed time
“We’re very disappointed in you, Spotify”
‘Sex redistribution’ and the means of reproduction
Tesla probably needs to raise capital this year
No entitlement crisis in America
Free cash flow to whom?
Hey crypto bros! Journalism ≠ advertising
Human capital and the jobs guarantee
This is a tech bubble, when’s the crash?
The magic of adjustments: ebitla-dee-da
FUD, inglorious FUD
A complex analysis reaches same conclusion as simple one: hedge funds suck
The jobs guarantee and human-capital “nationalisation”
These hedge fund numbers can’t be right
The Vomiting Camel has escaped from Bitcoin zoo
Lies, damn lies, and charticles
The world doesn’t need more Elon Musks
No, Facebook should not become a nonprofit
Sell all crypto and abandon all blockchain
Immutable ledgers meet European data protection
Amazon is not a bubble
Japan’s economic miracle
Have you ever meta crypto joke you didn’t like?
Delaware should change its rules to let the light in
Who needs the labels anyway?
Baby Boomers want your family to finance a larger share of their retirement
No, America would not benefit from authoritarian central planning
No one needs to buy Tesla
How to win a debate in the cult of meritocracy
Steinhoff International and the case of Pepkor Global Sourcing
Sorry Jack, Bitcoin will not become the global currency
The “academic’s cryptocurrency” is an elegant waste of time
Cigarettes are the vice America needs
Well that’s one reason to buy yen…
Musicians, don’t just blame the labels for your lack of dough
Giving stock away to staff doesn’t absolve share buybacks
A penny for Macpherson’s thoughts on the nominal anchor
Monopoly and its discontents
A State of Mind
America is not the least protectionist country in the world
This is nuts, when does Netflix crash?
No Bloomberg, the world’s richest people did not lose $114bn…
Someone is wrong on the internet, government employee pensions and passive investing edition
Someone is wrong on the internet, possibly fragile
Someone is wrong on the internet, consumer financial regulation edition
Someone is wrong on the internet: tontine tokens [Update]
Someone is wrong on the internet, road economics edition
Someone is wrong on the internet, wages and the stock market edition

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2020. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don’t cut articles from and redistribute by email or post to the web.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *